|
The Small
Market Advisory Committee
March 2008
Meeting
The RAB Small Market Advisory
Committee (SMAC) was formed many years ago as a way for the RAB to stay in
touch with their small market constituency, which makes up more than half of
their membership. Committee members run the gamut of small market operators,
from the one-market owner to the individual operator to the large group
head.
The committee usually meets twice a
year—at the Spring RAB conference and at the Fall NAB Radio Show—either
separately or in combination with its companion committee, the Sales
Advisory Committee (SAC).
For the Atlanta RAB conference, the
SMAC and SAC meetings overlapped; each had time to itself, and both together
heard and saw RAB staffers presenting new and improved products and
services.
Welcoming Remarks
Committee Chair Jay
Philippone opened the SMAC meeting with welcoming remarks that set the
stage for the ensuing discussion:
The world has changed. The number one concern of the
people in this group—of those who responded to our e-mailing—has to be
their present advertisers. People are worried about what’s going to
happen. Advertisers are stressed. Regional and national dollars in small
markets are pretty much gone. Then there’s a generation problem:
jewelers, furniture store owners and those kinds of people have owned
their businesses for many years and are looking at retirement. If they
go away, what are we going to do?
The second issue has to do with the web:
streaming. . .NTR on the web. . .how does the Internet fit into the
broadcasting model?
And the third issue is the ever-popular, "How do I
find good salespeople, and once I’ve got them, how do I handle them?"
RAB
Executive Vice President/Services and committee liaison Mike Mahone
said, "As we look at the trades, the impression I get is that major market
radio is really having some major problems, but small market radio doesn’t
have any problems, business is terrific in small markets. As we go around
the room, I’d like to have you address that."
What's Working?
Jay asked for a show of hands: "Whose business was up?
Whose was down?" Most of the people in the room indicated their business was
up.
He followed up by saying, "Sales
for our advertisers are not good; they’re being bombarded with all kinds of
new products, and they’re trying them. It makes no sense to radio
broadcasters, but our advertisers feel that in this economy, trying
something new is important; ‘the same old’ is not working."
Jay asked the group whether they were trying new things,
and what was working.
Committee member: "In general, with
everything that’s changing, with us still going out and selling radio the
old way—they’re tired of hearing it. They’re being bombarded with a million
new ideas. But if you bring one that’s really logical—especially if it
involves the Internet—they sit forward and listen."
Hot Topic: Interactive
One
committee member said, "We ask the question of our clients all the time: ‘Do
you have an Internet site?’ Yes. ‘Why?’ Because we have to. ‘How do you
promote it?’ And then you get that ‘deer in the headlights’ look. But when
you present an idea that involves the Internet, they lean forward and
listen."
Mahone asked, "What kind of solutions are you giving them
when they say, ‘I’m looking for something new, something with a digital
component’? What are you offering?"
One member responded, "The main thing is brand name
awareness of our web site." When asked, "How do you do that?", he replied,
"How do you do it in radio? On-air ads and promos. If someone buys a flight,
he/she is always involved in something with our site. We always give our
sponsors links to their web sites. Any time we put a sponsor on our web
site, we automatically link to their site. Anything that is multimedia, that
gets visits to their web site, that gives people a reason to go to their web
site. . .the link might be a coupon, or anything."
Mahone then asked the group, "Do you feel that you’re
driving enough traffic to your web site? Enough unique visits to make
something happen for advertisers, based on the web component, even without
the broadcast component?"
One response: "Depends on the advertiser’s expectations.
We did a promotion in March, sponsored by a car dealer, and all we did was
put the dealer’s logo on our site; his clicks went up from 100 to over a
thousand. Whether that was effective, whether we sold any cars, I don’t
know; but his question was, Can we bring people to his web site?"
Another: "We tell the advertiser that we have the engine
to drive people to your web site. It’s just common sense. We do contesting
online, and we promote a lot of our contests online. And we promote the web
site on the air, over and over and over again."
Question to that member: "Do you sell the web component
separately, or is it just part of one big package?"
"We tried it separately, and we failed horribly. The
original thought was, sell it separately, keep everything separate; but now
we’ve combined it all."
"Do you see a future where you can separate it again?"
"No."
"Do you internally keep track of what you make off the
web?"
"Yes. Internally we break it
out. We never just give it away. The client receives a flat invoice; we
never break it out for him. But internally we know how much additional the
web component brought in."
Philippone then asked, "Does anyone do it differently?"
One member responded, "Yes. We have a whole separate
Internet group. We actually have a separate Internet budget."
Mahone asked, "Do all of you have an Internet budget?
Goals set for the Internet?"
One member said, "We just started to separate it."
Another member asked the group, "What’s your retention
rate with clients on the Internet?"
The woman who said she had a separate Internet group
replied, "Those who are consistent, pretty much stay on. They usually come
on at first through a sales package."
Another replied, "I just had two or
three cancellations on the Internet last week. We started selling it
separately in September. I got 70,000 unique visits in the month of
September, in a small town, and it’s stuck there. We’re a News station, so
of course people come to the web site to check out cancellations and weather
information. But the people who did cancel their online ads are not radio
advertisers, either; they are store owners who advertise in the paper but
were attracted to our web site by the price. But two or three months into
the contract, they were not happy with the results. But as I look back at
it, it was probably the salesperson’s fault—unrealistic expectations."
Philippone asked, somewhat
rhetorically, "Is the Internet a part of our regular business, or is it a
separate business that we’re trying to make part of the radio business?"
A committee member contributed, "I think today, at least
in small markets, the Internet has to be part of an overall package; but I
think the biggest issue is, How do we set expectations? You can talk about
the number of clicks all day long, but I think certainly from the training
point of view, our sales people will need to be trained especially in web
advertising."
Philippone then asked, "Do any of you have a person who is
devoted exclusively to the web?"
One person responded that he had a person who did nothing
but web: "The was full time, but then he started to grow, and now he has his
own business, still operating out of our office; now he is on a contract
basis with us." Most of the other committee members used someone in the
office as webmaster, doing double duty.
The person with the full-time webmaster said, "For the
first couple of years, there was a lot of attrition as we homed in on what
we needed."
He continued, "With all the big national web sites that
get lots of hits, clients expect low cost per thousand numbers, so we have
to face that and bring their expectations more into line with a small local
web site. We position it as a supplement."
Another member made the point that in the radio world, we
have a limited number of stations, but in the Internet world, we are just
one of millions of possibilities.
Mahone noted, "That’s good news and bad news. The bad news
is the fact that there are all these opportunities, places that you can go
on the web to do different things. The value of what we do in broadcasting
is that we have the ability, through our connections with our listeners, to
drive them to where we want them to go.
"Jeff Haley’s definition of ‘radio’ is, ‘audio that you
can hear anywhere.’ It will be interesting to see, as all this plays out,
whether the Internet can drive the results in the same way that radio and
other traditional media can. Also, can it do the same thing on a local scale
that it can do on a national scale?"
How's Business?
Mahone continued with a question: "Did your web revenues
go up or down in 2007 compared to 2006?"
One member said hers doubled. Others
said "level." Some said they were up 10 to 20%. One said that even though he
doesn’t break it out separately, he knows that his web contribution was way
up for last year, primarily because of special promotions that he does
online. Still others said they were just beginning to monetize their web
presence.
One member noted that he has
four radio stations in one location, and each of them has its own full time,
dedicated webmaster. Our market is down about 2%, our own radio is up about
2%, and we’re projecting that are Internet will be up about 18%.
One member made the point, to which everyone else agreed,
"It’s like anything else. When we put our attention on it, the revenue goes
up; when we take our attention off of it, the revenue goes down."
Making Money on the Web
Mahone said he had one more question, to which Philippone
said, "Ask all the questions you want. This is an important topic." Mahone’s
question: "Where are you generating the revenue? Most of the revenue coming
from radio station web sites that we hear about are from display ads and
sponsorships. Is that true?"
One member said most of her revenue is coming from
database marketing—she has a Listener Club that ties in most of her online
advertisers. She sends out e-mail blasts containing news about the
community, about the station, about special promotions, etc., and they all
have advertiser messages as well.
Mahone asked, "Do the advertisers pay on actual ‘opens,’
or just on the ‘send?’" The answer: "Just on the send."
The member continued, "At first, our sales people were
selling these things like crazy, and we were sending out four or five
‘e-blasts’ per week. But that was too many, so we are limiting them to one
per week now. I think two a week is about ideal."
Another member said they sell a lot of "custom
channels"—"The navigation bar down the left side of the page represents
‘channels,’ and we sell sponsored pages. The ‘channels’ have content
generated by us—the Health Channel, the travel Channel, etc.—and we sell
sponsorships that appear on the page."
From another member: "We run audio from our local news-
and sportscasts on our web site, and we sell commercials to run before the
newscasts starts. We simply bring over their radio commercials. We can also
do video, so if they are running a TV ad, it’s easy for us to convert that
into an online ad. In fact, we have our own personalities go out with
cameras and shoot video of our sponsors, and we use that on the site as
well."
Another member said that he
picked up a Panasonic digital camera for $219 that looks every bit as good
on his web site as anything he’s seen on other sites, including national
ones.
Another member suggested that we package something
together so that the advertiser can put his cable TV ad on our web site.
Several other members voiced agreement, with one saying, "these days,
newspapers are in the TV business, TV is in the newspaper business—we’re all
in everybody else’s business."
Philippone asked others how hard it
was to put video on their web sites. One respondent, "we just post our
videos to YouTube and then link to them. Not only are they on your web site,
but they are everywhere."
Mahone contributed that there
are several pieces of software available to do this, so if you do want to do
it yourself, it’s not at all expensive.
The Streaming Question
Philippone then asked how many people were streaming. Are
you streaming your music product 24/7, or just specifics?
One member said, "We are streaming what we call our ‘Adult
Station.’ One of our biggest challenges is office penetration; this way
people can receive our radio station over the Internet.
A member said, "I did the math, and it looks like in 2010,
if you have 100 people listening 24/7, for one year, it would cost about
$24,000. Does anybody know how to make that work?"
One member said, "We already have a sponsor lined up to
underwrite our streaming, and we plan to start at the end of first quarter.
It’ll cost us about $2,200 a month, and the sponsor is picking that up."
Another member said. "We streamed our high school football
games, and that’s all. We do really well with them. We hooked up with a
company that provides the gateway. We’re up to, I think 1,500 hits are a
couple of our games."
Another: "We only stream what our
lawyer calls our ‘intellectual property’—locally-produced newscasts, talk
shows, etc. We don’t stream them live, necessarily, but we’ll capture and
upload them to the web site. The Internet has allowed us to cover four
football games simultaneously, so, in essence, it has increased our
revenues; we sell the ads on the air, and we get additional money for
replays and Internet-only broadcasts."
Mahone summed up the interactive
discussion—far and away the top topic—by saying, "I understand right now
that the [interactive] revenue streams are not necessarily what you want
them to be, but they will be. How long is it going to take? Three years?
Five years? Seven years? I don’t know what the timeline is, but it
definitely is coming. Our mission at the Radio Advertising Bureau is to make
sure that we none of us gets left behind."
Jeff Haley Weighs In
The
RAB chief, who sat in on most of the meeting, was invited by Philippone to
give his thoughts. Haley said, "As you are looking at the Internet component
of your business, the question to ask is, ‘How much of this is complementary
to what I’m already doing?’ You’re going to get more bang for your buck if
you have the ability to capture not only the radio revenue but also the
online as well. Rather than thinking of it as, ‘I have this bucket over
here, which is smaller, and this bucket over here, which is larger,’ it’s
about making that 97% [the radio portion] bigger. We’re trying to focus
everyone on the fact that this is not online sales in place of radio
sales; it’s online sales added to radio sales. Instead of a
single-channel distribution system, you’ve got a multi-channel distribution
system."
A committee member said, "I think one of our big problems
is that our advertisers have not figured out how to monetize their own web
presence. They are not going to throw a lot of money at supporting a
stagnant web page."
Another member noted that, "The problem I see is that if
an advertiser has $1,000 to spend, and he spends $150 on the Internet, that
means he is reducing his radio frequency, and that’s going to be less
effective for him."
Mahone responded, "The advertiser should be spending the
same amount on your radio station, and should be adding dollars for the
interactive component. The newspaper guys, the cable guys, they’re trying to
get advertising dollars from the same client. It’s a question of protecting
market share."
Keeping Salespeople -- and Productive
Philippone asked, "What about your sales people? In a lot
of radio stations, the sales people are getting beat up by the clients. What
are people doing to keep their salespeople propped up?"
One member responded, "I think that you keep them fresh
and alive with new ideas. When they get excited about those ideas, and
present them to the client, and the client gets excited, everybody wins."
Another: "Sometimes they’ll come dragging back to the
station, and it turns out they’ve made another unproductive call on somebody
like a car dealer. We encourage them to keep it fresh by going after new
categories."
Philippone mentioned, "In talking to
other stations, we find that a lot of them are strengthening their benefits
packages to keep their people happier."
One member chimed in, "People
really value their time. So we give them extra time off—like an extra day
around Christmas."
Mahone then asked the assembled, "What is your turnover
like?"
A committee member responded, "In smaller markets, it’s
not that bad. And right now, we are getting better candidates. All our sales
managers have a requirement to interview four people a month."
Another said, "A sales trainer once told me, you have to
have a buzz about your radio station as a great place to work. This will
attract good-quality candidates."
In response to Mahone’s question about where sales
candidates are coming from these days, a committee member answered, "The
last two we hired were radio sales people from other markets. Otherwise,
they come from a variety of places; life insurance is a good category,
because they’re also selling an intangible."
Another put in, "We have a
RegionalHelpWanted.com
website, and that is our best recruiting tool. We also have a sign outside
our radio station, ‘Always looking for great people.’ That reminds people
who come into the station that we’re always looking; we get phone calls from
that."
Philippone asked Jeff Haley if he had any concluding
remarks. Haley said, "There is a sense that there is small-market radio and
then there’s large-market radio, and they are quite different. But as I
attend these meetings, I am struck by the fact that small-market radio and
large-market radio have more similarities than differences. It’s important
to understand the distinctions, but it is reassuring to me that the same
concerns I've heard around this table are the same kinds of concerns that I
hear when I’m with larger market broadcasters."
Our thanks to RAB Vice President/Member Services Mary
Malone for her invaluable assistance with this article. |